truth vs. karma

i received a comment on my last post which inspired this post.

the commenter responded:

Karma is not about truth, and often can be adverse to it. It is mechanical, as you said, a prison. Nor is it contingent upon who we are, as we are all intrinsically good people. And yet people may spend lifetimes trapped in bad karmic loops. When one doesn’t feel good about themselves, or when they allow others to make them feel bad about themselves, they may allow bad karma to affect them. Eternal vigilance is the price of virtue. Leave karma to itself, or guard your own. How about a post on the nature of truth?

and i say:

karma has everything to do with truth. it is the ultimate truth. it is not contingent upon who we are in that it is completely out of our control. You cannot guard your own karma; it is impossible, and besides, it is not yours to guard.

people often mistake social behavior with karma, because social interaction has karma-like tendencies. bad things do happen to good people, but bad things tend to happen more frequently to bad people (or people who do bad things, for as you said we are all intrinsically good people.) People who do bad things alienate themselves from others due to the bad energy they bring into the world, which spirals into a vicious cycle of feeling bad, channelling that emotion by doing more bad things, and inciting bad reactions which perpetuate the negative emotion. Many potentially good people frustrate themselves when they are tangled in this spiral because they continue to commit actions that result in the opposite of their inherently good intentions. Only those with strong will and emotional fortitude have the ability to lift themselves above it. They know not to let the negativity they encounter (for there are many caught in bad energy loops) affect them, and channel it in positive ways.

truth is relative to scale. on a karmic level, it is objective. on a human level, it is more subjective and fluid. for more thoughts on the latter, you should check out my thesis blog, freereverie.org/neticulum. i’ve been posting a lot lately on the nature of collective knowledge, which is inexorably linked with human conceptions of truth. as for the former, it is one of the only truths we will ever know (and at the same time can never know). karma is fate, it is kismet, it is fortune, and we are bound to it regardless of our mortal activity. though to our limited human perception it may at times seem unfair or arbitrary, it is in the long run just and directed. in order to honor the ultimate truth of karma, we must be truthful in what we can control – our human interactions. human energy exchanges reward honesty, even when it comes at a price. sometimes the truth hurts. we would rather believe – and have others believe – false truths that suit us, rather than actual truths that expose our weaknesses and shortcomings. and sometimes we get away with promoting false truths to others, especially the gullible, the vulnerable, and the weak of mind. but we cannot fool the intelligent, the perceptive, and those who know secret things; they can see through the propaganda. these are the people who will help you grow and flourish, because they are not satiated by excuses or false justifications; they won’t put up with your bullshit. they are the kind of people we should be and surround ourselves with. it’s not always easy; especially those with regrets and demons have a tendency to want to believe in convenient realities so badly that they fool themselves into actually believing them. they need only realize that to stop deluding others and depriving themselves of honest, productive, and positive social interaction, they must stop deluding themselves. its painful to have your fantasy world crash down upon you in shambles, but it is the only way to break the loop and actually make something of yourself. ignorance is not bliss; it is hell. a hell that is tempting but lures people into spiritual apathy. truth is the ultimate weapon of human (both collective and individual) progress. we must not only cleanse the doors of perception, but turn them inward, for one who is opaque to themself can never be pure.

3 Comments

  1. Mike E said,

    November 22, 2008 at 2:54 pm

    In turning inward, do we really discover that we are intrinsically good people? Or is there a more painful paradox there? It seems to me that while we’re most naturally ordered to the good, we often neglect our best and most altruistic selves and instead choose to act selfishly. This would be what Christianity calls ‘fallen’ human nature. Maybe in saying that people are intrinsically good, you mean that people have within themselves everything they need to attain and maintain this best and most natural goodness – that man doesn’t need a savior. Does your experience support this? I am curious. How do you treat free will in your system?

  2. Mike E said,

    November 22, 2008 at 3:32 pm

    Sorry, I realize it may be a little rude to invade your dreams with allusions to the old orthodox metaphysics, but your project seems to be noble, an attempt to return to the fantastic beauty of the now and live in the moment. Of course, I too would like to inhabit that verdant and enchanted place, but it seems the mind is such an obstacle. Should we abandon Reason for madness to live only by feeling, or should we instead abandon our desire to conquer Reason and accept our inherited ordering, finding freedom in the small things, with the moment being the only remaining frontier? (Lots of questions. I do hope you have time to respond.)

  3. admin said,

    November 24, 2008 at 12:31 pm

    Mike English! Thanks for responding to my posts and for your insightful questions. Perhaps my argument confused this point, but I am not trying to position present emotion as against or mutually exclusive to the mind; both are necessary for goodness. While people are inherently good, both their immediate perception of the moment as well as their rational deliberation/action can skew them off the right path. This is where free will comes in – we can shape our reactions, and our perceptions to a certain extent (through our attitude and state of mind), to create the right circumstances for us to do the right thing. There’s no formula for “what should be done” I have a feeling we may diverge here because i follow a more nietzschean conception of subjective morality. this is why we need both our minds and our emotions to guide us along.

Post a Comment